# Certain applications for Protection (Class XA) visas taken to be applications for Temporary Protection (Class XD) visas

> reg-2.08F — as in force on 2026-06-01 — F2026C00497 · Compilation No. 287 — https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2026C00497/latest/text

2.08F Certain applications for Protection (Class XA) visas taken to be
          applications for Temporary Protection (Class XD) visas

               Conversion regulation
          (1) For section 45AA of the Act, despite anything else in the Act, a valid application
              (a pre-conversion application) for a Protection (Class XA) visa made before the
              commencement of this regulation by an applicant prescribed by subregulation (2)
              is, immediately after this regulation starts to apply in relation to the application
              under subregulation (3):
                (a) taken not to be, and never to have been, a valid application for a Protection
                    (Class XA) visa; and
                (b) taken to be, and always to have been, a valid application for a Temporary
                    Protection (Class XD) visa, made by the prescribed applicant.
               Note 1:   As a result, the Minister is required to make a decision on the pre-conversion
                         application as if it were a valid application for a Temporary Protection (Class XD) visa.
               Note 2:   If the first instalment of visa application charge for the pre-conversion application had
                         been paid before this regulation starts to apply, the first instalment of visa application
                         charge for an application for a Temporary Protection (Class XD) visa (if any) is taken
                         to have been paid. See section 45AA of the Act.

               Prescribed applicants
          (2) The following are prescribed applicants:
               (a) an applicant who holds, or has ever held, any of the following visas:
                     (i) a Subclass 785 (Temporary Protection) visa granted before
                         2 December 2013;
                    (ii) a Temporary Safe Haven (Class UJ) visa;
                   (iii) a Temporary (Humanitarian Concern) (Class UO) visa;
               (b) an applicant who did not hold a visa that was in effect on the applicant’s
                   last entry into Australia;
               (c) an applicant who is an unauthorised maritime arrival;
               (d) an applicant who was not immigration cleared on the applicant’s last entry
                   into Australia.









               When this regulation starts to apply
          (3) This regulation starts to apply in relation to a pre-conversion application
              immediately after the occurrence of whichever of the following events is
              applicable to the application:
                (a) if, before the commencement of this regulation, the Minister had not made
                     a decision in relation to the pre-conversion application under section 65 of
                     the Act—the commencement of this regulation;
               (b) in a case in which the Minister had made such a decision before the
                     commencement of this regulation—one of the following events, if the
                     event occurs on or after the commencement of this regulation:
                       (i) the Administrative Appeals Tribunal remits a matter in relation to the
                           pre-conversion application in accordance with paragraph 415(2)(c) of
                           the Act as in force when the matter is remitted;
                      (ii) the Administrative Appeals Tribunal remits a matter in relation to the
                           pre-conversion application in accordance with paragraph 43(1)(c) of
                           the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 as in force when the
                           matter is remitted;
                    (iia) the ART remits a matter in relation to the pre-conversion application
                           in accordance with subsection 349(2) of the Act;
                    (iib) the ART remits a matter in relation to the pre-conversion application
                           in accordance with paragraph 105(c) of the ART Act;
                     (iii) a court orders the Minister to reconsider the pre-conversion
                           application in accordance with the law;
                     (iv) a court declares or concludes (with or without formal declaration) that
                           a decision of the Minister in relation to the pre-conversion application
                           is invalid, void or of no effect;
                      (v) a court quashes a decision of the Minister in relation to the
                           pre-conversion application.
          (4) To avoid doubt, for the purposes of subregulation (3), the Minister is taken not to
              have made a decision in relation to a pre-conversion visa application under
              section 65 of the Act if, before 16 December 2014:
                (a) the Minister had made a decision in relation to the pre-conversion
                    application under section 65 of the Act; and
                (b) one of the following events occurred after the Minister made that decision:
                      (i) the Refugee Review Tribunal remitted a matter in relation to the
                          pre-conversion application in accordance with paragraph 415(2)(c) of
                          the Act as in force when the matter was remitted;
                     (ii) the Administrative Appeals Tribunal remitted a matter in relation to
                          the pre-conversion application in accordance with paragraph 43(1)(c)
                          of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 as in force when the
                          matter was remitted;
                    (iii) a court ordered the Minister to reconsider the pre-conversion
                          application in accordance with the law;









                      (iv) a court declared or concluded (with or without formal declaration)
                            that a decision of the Minister in relation to the pre-conversion
                            application was invalid, void or of no effect;
                       (v) a court quashed a decision of the Minister in relation to the
                            pre-conversion application; and
                  (c) after the occurrence of the event mentioned in paragraph (b), the Minister
                      had not made another decision in relation to the pre-conversion application.
               Note:     This regulation commenced on 16 December 2014.
